lbarx/stbcx. are implemented on e6500, but not on e5500.
Likewise, SMT is on e6500, but not on e5500.
So, avoid executing an unimplemented instruction by only locking
when needed (i.e. in the presence of SMT).
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
+#include <asm/mmu.h>
+
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
static inline int tlb1_next(void)
unsigned long tmp;
int token = smp_processor_id() + 1;
+ /*
+ * Besides being unnecessary in the absence of SMT, this
+ * check prevents trying to do lbarx/stbcx. on e5500 which
+ * doesn't implement either feature.
+ */
+ if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_SMT))
+ return;
+
asm volatile("1: lbarx %0, 0, %1;"
"cmpwi %0, 0;"
"bne 2f;"
{
struct paca_struct *paca = get_paca();
+ if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_SMT))
+ return;
+
isync();
paca->tcd_ptr->lock = 0;
}