As reported by Manfred Schlaegl here
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=
143482089824232&w=2
commit
514ac99c64b "can: fix multiple delivery of a single CAN frame for
overlapping CAN filters" requires the skb->tstamp to be set to check for
identical CAN skbs.
As net timestamping is influenced by several players (netstamp_needed and
netdev_tstamp_prequeue) Manfred missed a proper timestamp which leads to
CAN frame loss.
As skb timestamping became now mandatory for CAN related skbs this patch
makes sure that received CAN skbs always have a proper timestamp set.
Maybe there's a better solution in the future but this patch fixes the
CAN frame loss so far.
Reported-by: Manfred Schlaegl <manfred.schlaegl@gmx.at>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
struct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data;
u8 dlc = cf->can_dlc;
+ if (!(skb->tstamp.tv64))
+ __net_timestamp(skb);
+
netif_rx(priv->echo_skb[idx]);
priv->echo_skb[idx] = NULL;
if (unlikely(!skb))
return NULL;
+ __net_timestamp(skb);
skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_CAN);
skb->pkt_type = PACKET_BROADCAST;
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
if (unlikely(!skb))
return NULL;
+ __net_timestamp(skb);
skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_CANFD);
skb->pkt_type = PACKET_BROADCAST;
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
if (!skb)
return;
+ __net_timestamp(skb);
skb->dev = sl->dev;
skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_CAN);
skb->pkt_type = PACKET_BROADCAST;
skb->dev = dev;
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
+ if (!(skb->tstamp.tv64))
+ __net_timestamp(skb);
+
netif_rx_ni(skb);
}
return err;
}
- if (newskb)
+ if (newskb) {
+ if (!(newskb->tstamp.tv64))
+ __net_timestamp(newskb);
+
netif_rx_ni(newskb);
+ }
/* update statistics */
can_stats.tx_frames++;