Right now, the same undocumented structs are on two places:
at ca_data_types.rst and together with their ioctls.
Move them to just one place and use the standard way to
represent them.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
``msg``
Pointer to struct :c:type:`ca_msg`.
+.. c:type:: ca_msg
-.. c:type:: struct ca_msg
-
-.. flat-table:: struct ca_msg
- :header-rows: 1
- :stub-columns: 0
-
- -
- - type
- - name
- - description
- -
- - unsigned int
- - index
- -
-
- -
- - unsigned int
- - type
- -
-
- -
- - unsigned int
- - length
- -
-
- -
- - unsigned char
- - msg[256]
- -
+.. code-block:: c
+ /* a message to/from a CI-CAM */
+ struct ca_msg {
+ unsigned int index;
+ unsigned int type;
+ unsigned int length;
+ unsigned char msg[256];
+ };
Description
-----------
``msg``
Pointer to struct :c:type:`ca_descr`.
+.. c:type:: ca_descr
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ struct ca_descr {
+ unsigned int index;
+ unsigned int parity;
+ unsigned char cw[8];
+ };
+
Description
-----------
*************
.. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/linux/dvb/ca.h
-
-.. c:type:: ca_msg
-
-Undocumented data types
-=======================
-
-.. note::
-
- Those data types are undocumented. Documentation is welcome.
-
-.. c:type:: ca_msg
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
- /* a message to/from a CI-CAM */
- struct ca_msg {
- unsigned int index;
- unsigned int type;
- unsigned int length;
- unsigned char msg[256];
- };
-
-
-.. c:type:: ca_descr
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
- struct ca_descr {
- unsigned int index;
- unsigned int parity;
- unsigned char cw[8];
- };