Several places open-code extraction of the EC field from an ESR_ELx
value, in subtly different ways. This is unfortunate duplication and
variation, and the precise logic used to extract the field is a
distraction.
This patch adds a new macro, ESR_ELx_EC(), to extract the EC field from
an ESR_ELx value in a consistent fashion.
Existing open-coded extractions in core arm64 code are moved over to the
new helper. KVM code is left as-is for the moment.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@arm.com>
Cc: Dave P Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Change-Id: Ib634a4795277d243fce5dd30b139e2ec1465bee9
(cherry picked from commit
275f344bec51e9100bae81f3cc8c6940bbfb24c0)
Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
#define ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT (26)
#define ESR_ELx_EC_MASK (UL(0x3F) << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT)
+#define ESR_ELx_EC(esr) (((esr) & ESR_ELx_EC_MASK) >> ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT)
#define ESR_ELx_IL (UL(1) << 25)
#define ESR_ELx_ISS_MASK (ESR_ELx_IL - 1)
const char *esr_get_class_string(u32 esr)
{
- return esr_class_str[esr >> ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT];
+ return esr_class_str[ESR_ELx_EC(esr)];
}
/*
static inline int permission_fault(unsigned int esr)
{
- unsigned int ec = (esr & ESR_ELx_EC_MASK) >> ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT;
+ unsigned int ec = ESR_ELx_EC(esr);
unsigned int fsc_type = esr & ESR_ELx_FSC_TYPE;
return (ec == ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_CUR && fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM);