mm, vmscan: remove unused mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate
authorMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Wed, 22 Feb 2017 23:44:15 +0000 (15:44 -0800)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:41:29 +0000 (16:41 -0800)
Patch series "vm, vmscan: enahance vmscan tracepoints", v2.

While debugging [2] I've realized that there is some room for
improvements in the tracepoints set we offer currently.  I had hard
times to make any conclusion from the existing ones.  The resulting
problem turned out to be active list aging [3] and we are missing at
least two tracepoints to debug such a problem.

Some existing tracepoints could export more information to see _why_ the
reclaim progress cannot be made not only _how much_ we could reclaim.
The later could be seen quite reasonably from the vmstat counters
already.  It can be argued that we are showing too many implementation
details in those tracepoints but I consider them way too lowlevel
already to be usable by any kernel independent userspace.  I would be
_really_ surprised if anything but debugging tools have used them.

Any feedback is highly appreciated.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161228153032.10821-1-mhocko@kernel.org
[2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161215225702.GA27944@boerne.fritz.box
[3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161223105157.GB23109@dhcp22.suse.cz

This patch (of 8):

The trace point is not used since 925b7673cce3 ("mm: make per-memcg LRU
lists exclusive") so it can be removed.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104101942.4860-2-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
include/trace/events/vmscan.h

index c88fd0934e7ead911941d13272bb89215584ba67..39bad8921ca1e09c5acd534a710e2d260ff7a114 100644 (file)
@@ -269,8 +269,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_shrink_slab_end,
                __entry->retval)
 );
 
-DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template,
-
+TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate,
        TP_PROTO(int classzone_idx,
                int order,
                unsigned long nr_requested,
@@ -311,34 +310,6 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template,
                __entry->file)
 );
 
-DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template, mm_vmscan_lru_isolate,
-
-       TP_PROTO(int classzone_idx,
-               int order,
-               unsigned long nr_requested,
-               unsigned long nr_scanned,
-               unsigned long nr_taken,
-               isolate_mode_t isolate_mode,
-               int file),
-
-       TP_ARGS(classzone_idx, order, nr_requested, nr_scanned, nr_taken, isolate_mode, file)
-
-);
-
-DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate,
-
-       TP_PROTO(int classzone_idx,
-               int order,
-               unsigned long nr_requested,
-               unsigned long nr_scanned,
-               unsigned long nr_taken,
-               isolate_mode_t isolate_mode,
-               int file),
-
-       TP_ARGS(classzone_idx, order, nr_requested, nr_scanned, nr_taken, isolate_mode, file)
-
-);
-
 TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_writepage,
 
        TP_PROTO(struct page *page),