As I found by chance while merging another patch, the usage of
a dma-mask in this DT node is wrong for multiple reasons:
- dma-masks are a Linux specific concept, not a general
hardware feature
- In DT, we use the "dma-ranges" property to describe how DMA
addresses related between devices.
- The 40-bit mask appears to be completely unnecessary here, as
the SoC cannot address that much memory anyway, so simply
asking for a 64-bit mask (as supported by the device) should
succeed anyway.
The patch to remove the parsing of the property is getting merged
through the crypto tree.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
interrupt-names = "mem", "ring0", "ring1",
"ring2", "ring3", "eip";
clocks = <&cpm_clk 1 26>;
- dma-mask = <0xff 0xffffffff>;
};
};
interrupt-names = "mem", "ring0", "ring1",
"ring2", "ring3", "eip";
clocks = <&cps_clk 1 26>;
- dma-mask = <0xff 0xffffffff>;
/*
* The cryptographic engine found on the cp110
* master is enabled by default at the SoC