Btrfs: Improve FL_KEEP_SIZE handling in fallocate
authorDavide Italiano <dccitaliano@gmail.com>
Tue, 7 Apr 2015 05:09:15 +0000 (22:09 -0700)
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Mon, 4 Apr 2016 14:25:28 +0000 (16:25 +0200)
- We call inode_size_ok() only if FL_KEEP_SIZE isn't specified.
- As an optimisation we can skip the call if (off + len)
  isn't greater than the current size of the file. This operation
  is called under the lock so the less work we do, the better.
- If we call inode_size_ok() pass to it the correct value rather
  than a more conservative estimation.

Signed-off-by: Davide Italiano <dccitaliano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
fs/btrfs/file.c

index 15a09cb156cec4c59776c683ecc2f98527e98d15..7af1abda68d0ca17ab41b22933d5a651b04010e6 100644 (file)
@@ -2682,9 +2682,12 @@ static long btrfs_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode,
                return ret;
 
        inode_lock(inode);
-       ret = inode_newsize_ok(inode, alloc_end);
-       if (ret)
-               goto out;
+
+       if (!(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE) && offset + len > inode->i_size) {
+               ret = inode_newsize_ok(inode, offset + len);
+               if (ret)
+                       goto out;
+       }
 
        /*
         * TODO: Move these two operations after we have checked