Since ipoib_cm_tx_start function and ipoib_cm_tx_reap function
belong to different work queues, they can run in parallel.
In this case if ipoib_cm_tx_reap calls list_del and release the
lock, ipoib_cm_tx_start may acquire it and call list_del_init
on the already deleted object.
Changing list_del to list_del_init in ipoib_cm_tx_reap fixes the problem.
Fixes:
839fcaba355a ("IPoIB: Connected mode experimental support")
Signed-off-by: Feras Daoud <ferasda@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Erez Shitrit <erezsh@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Vesker <valex@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
while (!list_empty(&priv->cm.reap_list)) {
p = list_entry(priv->cm.reap_list.next, typeof(*p), list);
- list_del(&p->list);
+ list_del_init(&p->list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev);
ipoib_cm_tx_destroy(p);