Impact: clarify lockdep printk text
print_irq_inversion_bug() gets handed state strings of the form
"HARDIRQ", "SOFTIRQ", "RECLAIM_FS"
and appends "-irq-{un,}safe" to them, which is either redudant for *IRQ or
confusing in the RECLAIM_FS case.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <
1236175192.5330.7585.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr));
print_lock(this);
if (forwards)
- printk("but this lock took another, %s-irq-unsafe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
+ printk("but this lock took another, %s-unsafe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
else
- printk("but this lock was taken by another, %s-irq-safe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
+ printk("but this lock was taken by another, %s-safe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
print_lock_name(other);
printk("\n\nand interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.\n\n");