lockdep: remove extra "irq" string
authorPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:53:24 +0000 (14:53 +0100)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 17:38:34 +0000 (18:38 +0100)
Impact: clarify lockdep printk text

print_irq_inversion_bug() gets handed state strings of the form

  "HARDIRQ", "SOFTIRQ", "RECLAIM_FS"

and appends "-irq-{un,}safe" to them, which is either redudant for *IRQ or
confusing in the RECLAIM_FS case.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1236175192.5330.7585.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
kernel/lockdep.c

index ef6584fd9fe570d39b2bedf3393eda3d2473d400..02014f7ccc865fb8b7bb092dfbbb7dcae1b4787f 100644 (file)
@@ -1900,9 +1900,9 @@ print_irq_inversion_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct lock_class *other,
                curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr));
        print_lock(this);
        if (forwards)
-               printk("but this lock took another, %s-irq-unsafe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
+               printk("but this lock took another, %s-unsafe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
        else
-               printk("but this lock was taken by another, %s-irq-safe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
+               printk("but this lock was taken by another, %s-safe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
        print_lock_name(other);
        printk("\n\nand interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.\n\n");