alpha: reorganize copy_process(), prepare to saner fork_idle()
authorAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Sun, 21 Oct 2012 19:52:04 +0000 (15:52 -0400)
committerAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Thu, 29 Nov 2012 02:49:04 +0000 (21:49 -0500)
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
arch/alpha/kernel/process.c

index ad86c099b6f566157c9e64e16329d480d4d83b8b..a4dc79ba030fab68ec004ead9ae84d3b1c70bd23 100644 (file)
@@ -266,18 +266,22 @@ alpha_vfork(void)
 int
 copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long usp,
            unsigned long arg,
-           struct task_struct * p, struct pt_regs * regs)
+           struct task_struct *p, struct pt_regs *wontuse)
 {
        extern void ret_from_fork(void);
        extern void ret_from_kernel_thread(void);
 
        struct thread_info *childti = task_thread_info(p);
        struct pt_regs *childregs = task_pt_regs(p);
+       struct pt_regs *regs = current_pt_regs();
        struct switch_stack *childstack, *stack;
        unsigned long settls;
 
        childstack = ((struct switch_stack *) childregs) - 1;
-       if (unlikely(!regs)) {
+       childti->pcb.ksp = (unsigned long) childstack;
+       childti->pcb.flags = 1; /* set FEN, clear everything else */
+
+       if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
                /* kernel thread */
                memset(childstack, 0,
                        sizeof(struct switch_stack) + sizeof(struct pt_regs));
@@ -286,12 +290,17 @@ copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long usp,
                childstack->r10 = arg;
                childregs->hae = alpha_mv.hae_cache,
                childti->pcb.usp = 0;
-               childti->pcb.ksp = (unsigned long) childstack;
-               childti->pcb.flags = 1; /* set FEN, clear everything else */
                return 0;
        }
+       /* Note: if CLONE_SETTLS is not set, then we must inherit the
+          value from the parent, which will have been set by the block
+          copy in dup_task_struct.  This is non-intuitive, but is
+          required for proper operation in the case of a threaded
+          application calling fork.  */
+       if (clone_flags & CLONE_SETTLS)
+               childti->pcb.unique = regs->r20;
+       childti->pcb.usp = usp ?: rdusp();
        *childregs = *regs;
-       settls = regs->r20;
        childregs->r0 = 0;
        childregs->r19 = 0;
        childregs->r20 = 1;     /* OSF/1 has some strange fork() semantics.  */
@@ -299,22 +308,6 @@ copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long usp,
        stack = ((struct switch_stack *) regs) - 1;
        *childstack = *stack;
        childstack->r26 = (unsigned long) ret_from_fork;
-       childti->pcb.usp = usp ?: rdusp();
-       childti->pcb.ksp = (unsigned long) childstack;
-       childti->pcb.flags = 1; /* set FEN, clear everything else */
-
-       /* Set a new TLS for the child thread?  Peek back into the
-          syscall arguments that we saved on syscall entry.  Oops,
-          except we'd have clobbered it with the parent/child set
-          of r20.  Read the saved copy.  */
-       /* Note: if CLONE_SETTLS is not set, then we must inherit the
-          value from the parent, which will have been set by the block
-          copy in dup_task_struct.  This is non-intuitive, but is
-          required for proper operation in the case of a threaded
-          application calling fork.  */
-       if (clone_flags & CLONE_SETTLS)
-               childti->pcb.unique = settls;
-
        return 0;
 }