drm/i915: Assert that the request hasn't been retired
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Fri, 5 Aug 2016 09:14:24 +0000 (10:14 +0100)
committerChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Fri, 5 Aug 2016 09:54:44 +0000 (10:54 +0100)
With all callers now not playing tricks with dropping the struct_mutex
between waiting and retiring, we can assert that the request is ready to
be retired.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470388464-28458-19-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c

index 1f91dc8c417134fe9f7ce316824d0aa946ed43e9..b317a672040ff0916b4a8ee63c5e48957d62a08f 100644 (file)
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static void i915_gem_request_retire(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
        struct i915_gem_active *active, *next;
 
        trace_i915_gem_request_retire(request);
-       list_del_init(&request->link);
+       list_del(&request->link);
 
        /* We know the GPU must have read the request to have
         * sent us the seqno + interrupt, so use the position
@@ -228,9 +228,7 @@ void i915_gem_request_retire_upto(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
        struct drm_i915_gem_request *tmp;
 
        lockdep_assert_held(&req->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
-
-       if (list_empty(&req->link))
-               return;
+       GEM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&req->link));
 
        do {
                tmp = list_first_entry(&engine->request_list,