sched/numa: Fix unsafe get_task_struct() in task_numa_assign()
authorKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 07:17:11 +0000 (11:17 +0400)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:46:02 +0000 (10:46 +0100)
Unlocked access to dst_rq->curr in task_numa_compare() is racy.
If curr task is exiting this may be a reason of use-after-free:

task_numa_compare()                    do_exit()
    ...                                        current->flags |= PF_EXITING;
    ...                                    release_task()
    ...                                        ~~delayed_put_task_struct()~~
    ...                                    schedule()
    rcu_read_lock()                        ...
    cur = ACCESS_ONCE(dst_rq->curr)        ...
        ...                                rq->curr = next;
        ...                                    context_switch()
        ...                                        finish_task_switch()
        ...                                            put_task_struct()
        ...                                                __put_task_struct()
        ...                                                    free_task_struct()
        task_numa_assign()                                     ...
            get_task_struct()                                  ...

As noted by Oleg:

  <<The lockless get_task_struct(tsk) is only safe if tsk == current
    and didn't pass exit_notify(), or if this tsk was found on a rcu
    protected list (say, for_each_process() or find_task_by_vpid()).
    IOW, it is only safe if release_task() was not called before we
    take rcu_read_lock(), in this case we can rely on the fact that
    delayed_put_pid() can not drop the (potentially) last reference
    until rcu_read_unlock().

    And as Kirill pointed out task_numa_compare()->task_numa_assign()
    path does get_task_struct(dst_rq->curr) and this is not safe. The
    task_struct itself can't go away, but rcu_read_lock() can't save
    us from the final put_task_struct() in finish_task_switch(); this
    reference goes away without rcu gp>>

The patch provides simple check of PF_EXITING flag. If it's not set,
this guarantees that call_rcu() of delayed_put_task_struct() callback
hasn't happened yet, so we can safely do get_task_struct() in
task_numa_assign().

Locked dst_rq->lock protects from concurrency with the last schedule().
Reusing or unmapping of cur's memory may happen without it.

Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1413962231.19914.130.camel@tkhai
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
kernel/sched/fair.c

index 0b069bf3e708e82ea0e08c5b204f931ca1d22a00..fbc0b8214af0a89fbde855e559884d6e3ca988fa 100644 (file)
@@ -1164,9 +1164,19 @@ static void task_numa_compare(struct task_numa_env *env,
        long moveimp = imp;
 
        rcu_read_lock();
-       cur = ACCESS_ONCE(dst_rq->curr);
-       if (cur->pid == 0) /* idle */
+
+       raw_spin_lock_irq(&dst_rq->lock);
+       cur = dst_rq->curr;
+       /*
+        * No need to move the exiting task, and this ensures that ->curr
+        * wasn't reaped and thus get_task_struct() in task_numa_assign()
+        * is safe under RCU read lock.
+        * Note that rcu_read_lock() itself can't protect from the final
+        * put_task_struct() after the last schedule().
+        */
+       if ((cur->flags & PF_EXITING) || is_idle_task(cur))
                cur = NULL;
+       raw_spin_unlock_irq(&dst_rq->lock);
 
        /*
         * "imp" is the fault differential for the source task between the