We ended up incorrectly using '&cur' instead of '&readin' in the
work_on_cpu() -> smp_call_function_single() transformation in commit
01599fca6758d2cd133e78f87426fc851c9ea725 ("cpufreq: use
smp_call_function_[single|many]() in acpi-cpufreq.c").
Andrew explains:
"OK, the acpi tree went and had conflicting changes merged into it after
I'd written the patch and it appears that I incorrectly reverted part
of
18b2646fe3babeb40b34a0c1751e0bf5adfdc64c while fixing the resulting
rejects.
Switching it to `readin' looks correct."
Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
unsigned int perf_percent;
unsigned int retval;
- if (smp_call_function_single(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &cur, 1))
+ if (smp_call_function_single(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &readin, 1))
return 0;
cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -