Commit
83fd9c7 changes l_level, l_requested and l_blocking of
ocfs2_lock_res from int to unsigned char. But actually it is
initially as -1(ocfs2_lock_res_init_common) which
correspoding to 255 for unsigned char. So the whole dlm lock
mechanism doesn't work now which means a disaster to ocfs2.
Cc: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
char l_name[OCFS2_LOCK_ID_MAX_LEN];
unsigned int l_ro_holders;
unsigned int l_ex_holders;
- unsigned char l_level;
+ char l_level;
+ char l_requested;
+ char l_blocking;
/* Data packed - type enum ocfs2_lock_type */
unsigned char l_type;
unsigned char l_action;
/* Data packed - enum type ocfs2_unlock_action */
unsigned char l_unlock_action;
- unsigned char l_requested;
- unsigned char l_blocking;
unsigned int l_pending_gen;
spinlock_t l_lock;