hpfs_unlink() calls permission() prior to truncating the file. HPFS
doesn't define a .permission method, so replace with explicit call to
generic_permission().
This is equivalent, except that devcgroup_inode_permission() and
security_inode_permission() are not called.
The truncation is just an implementation detail of the unlink, so
these security checks are unnecessary.
I suspect that even calling generic_permission() is unnecessary, since
we shouldn't mind if the file isn't writable. But I leave that to the
maintainer to decide.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
d_drop(dentry);
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
if (atomic_read(&dentry->d_count) > 1 ||
- permission(inode, MAY_WRITE, NULL) ||
+ generic_permission(inode, MAY_WRITE, NULL) ||
!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) ||
get_write_access(inode)) {
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);