The macro is to be used similarly as WARN_ON as:
if (WARN_ON_RATELIMIT(condition, state))
do_something();
One would expect only 'condition' to affect the 'if', but
WARN_ON_RATELIMIT does internally only:
WARN_ON((condition) && __ratelimit(state))
So the 'if' is affected by the ratelimiting state too. Fix this by
returning 'condition' in any case.
Note that nobody uses WARN_ON_RATELIMIT yet, so there is nothing to
worry about. But I was about to use it and was a bit surprised.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161215093224.23126-1-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK
-#define WARN_ON_RATELIMIT(condition, state) \
- WARN_ON((condition) && __ratelimit(state))
+#define WARN_ON_RATELIMIT(condition, state) ({ \
+ bool __rtn_cond = !!(condition); \
+ WARN_ON(__rtn_cond && __ratelimit(state)); \
+ __rtn_cond; \
+})
#define WARN_RATELIMIT(condition, format, ...) \
({ \