iwlwifi: mvm: handle RX MPDUs separately
authorJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Fri, 22 May 2015 10:09:44 +0000 (12:09 +0200)
committerEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Fri, 26 Jun 2015 06:00:24 +0000 (09:00 +0300)
There's no need to forward RX MPDUs to notification wait tests, nor
do we need to check them for firmware dump triggers, nor could they
be asynchronous. It's thus more efficient to handle them separately,
before going into the regular RX handlers.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/ops.c

index e4fa50075ffdc3b51c66f4b6587595134da9ade3..8f896cd1c9cd1c16b17ecc1d66ed1c6f43a15d68 100644 (file)
@@ -221,7 +221,6 @@ struct iwl_rx_handlers {
  * called from a worker with mvm->mutex held.
  */
 static const struct iwl_rx_handlers iwl_mvm_rx_handlers[] = {
-       RX_HANDLER(REPLY_RX_MPDU_CMD, iwl_mvm_rx_rx_mpdu, false),
        RX_HANDLER(REPLY_RX_PHY_CMD, iwl_mvm_rx_rx_phy_cmd, false),
        RX_HANDLER(TX_CMD, iwl_mvm_rx_tx_cmd, false),
        RX_HANDLER(BA_NOTIF, iwl_mvm_rx_ba_notif, false),
@@ -716,6 +715,9 @@ static int iwl_mvm_rx_dispatch(struct iwl_op_mode *op_mode,
        struct iwl_mvm *mvm = IWL_OP_MODE_GET_MVM(op_mode);
        u8 i;
 
+       if (likely(pkt->hdr.cmd == REPLY_RX_MPDU_CMD))
+               return iwl_mvm_rx_rx_mpdu(mvm, rxb, cmd);
+
        iwl_mvm_rx_check_trigger(mvm, pkt);
 
        /*