While working with ipmr, we noticed that it is impossible to determine
if an entry is actually unresolved or its IIF interface has disappeared
(e.g. virtual interface got deleted). These entries look almost
identical to user-space when dumping or receiving notifications. So in
order to recognize them add a new RTNH_F_UNRESOLVED flag which is set when
sending an unresolved cache entry to user-space.
Suggested-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
#define RTNH_F_ONLINK 4 /* Gateway is forced on link */
#define RTNH_F_OFFLOAD 8 /* offloaded route */
#define RTNH_F_LINKDOWN 16 /* carrier-down on nexthop */
+#define RTNH_F_UNRESOLVED 32 /* The entry is unresolved (ipmr) */
#define RTNH_COMPARE_MASK (RTNH_F_DEAD | RTNH_F_LINKDOWN | RTNH_F_OFFLOAD)
int ct;
/* If cache is unresolved, don't try to parse IIF and OIF */
- if (c->mfc_parent >= MAXVIFS)
+ if (c->mfc_parent >= MAXVIFS) {
+ rtm->rtm_flags |= RTNH_F_UNRESOLVED;
return -ENOENT;
+ }
if (VIF_EXISTS(mrt, c->mfc_parent) &&
nla_put_u32(skb, RTA_IIF, mrt->vif_table[c->mfc_parent].dev->ifindex) < 0)
int ct;
/* If cache is unresolved, don't try to parse IIF and OIF */
- if (c->mf6c_parent >= MAXMIFS)
+ if (c->mf6c_parent >= MAXMIFS) {
+ rtm->rtm_flags |= RTNH_F_UNRESOLVED;
return -ENOENT;
+ }
if (MIF_EXISTS(mrt, c->mf6c_parent) &&
nla_put_u32(skb, RTA_IIF, mrt->vif6_table[c->mf6c_parent].dev->ifindex) < 0)