x86: Remove STACKPROTECTOR_ALL
authorArjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:31:01 +0000 (07:31 -0700)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:35:23 +0000 (16:35 +0200)
STACKPROTECTOR_ALL has a really high overhead (runtime and stack
footprint) and is not really worth it protection wise (the
normal STACKPROTECTOR is in effect for all functions with
buffers already), so lets just remove the option entirely.

Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
LKML-Reference: <20091023073101.3dce4ebb@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
arch/x86/Kconfig
arch/x86/Makefile

index 07e01149e3bf07fe368bf466b89635d5b78149bb..72ace9515a07a44525778899e1ea04b32b3accbc 100644 (file)
@@ -1443,12 +1443,8 @@ config SECCOMP
 
          If unsure, say Y. Only embedded should say N here.
 
-config CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL
-       bool
-
 config CC_STACKPROTECTOR
        bool "Enable -fstack-protector buffer overflow detection (EXPERIMENTAL)"
-       select CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL
        ---help---
          This option turns on the -fstack-protector GCC feature. This
          feature puts, at the beginning of functions, a canary value on
index a012ee8ef803302642a5eac1daa791fe8f7c617a..d2d24c9ee64d926de80a249330e938095623ca85 100644 (file)
@@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
        cc_has_sp := $(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_$(BITS)-has-stack-protector.sh
         ifeq ($(shell $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(cc_has_sp) $(CC) $(biarch)),y)
                 stackp-y := -fstack-protector
-                stackp-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL) += -fstack-protector-all
                 KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(stackp-y)
         else
                 $(warning stack protector enabled but no compiler support)