rhashtable: fix for resize events during table walk
authorPhil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Mon, 6 Jul 2015 13:51:20 +0000 (15:51 +0200)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Wed, 8 Jul 2015 21:53:49 +0000 (14:53 -0700)
If rhashtable_walk_next detects a resize operation in progress, it jumps
to the new table and continues walking that one. But it misses to drop
the reference to it's current item, leading it to continue traversing
the new table's bucket in which the current item is sorted into, and
after reaching that bucket's end continues traversing the new table's
second bucket instead of the first one, thereby potentially missing
items.

This fixes the rhashtable runtime test for me. Bug probably introduced
by Herbert Xu's patch eddee5ba ("rhashtable: Fix walker behaviour during
rehash") although not explicitly tested.

Fixes: eddee5ba ("rhashtable: Fix walker behaviour during rehash")
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
lib/rhashtable.c

index a60a6d335a91a6aa90f019f77062e7be069939fd..cc0c69710dcf8a2c7474b759be72e8fa22c2ca1f 100644 (file)
@@ -610,6 +610,8 @@ next:
                iter->skip = 0;
        }
 
+       iter->p = NULL;
+
        /* Ensure we see any new tables. */
        smp_rmb();
 
@@ -620,8 +622,6 @@ next:
                return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
        }
 
-       iter->p = NULL;
-
        return NULL;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rhashtable_walk_next);