sched/debug: Fix printing large integers on 32-bit platforms
authorPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Mon, 14 May 2012 12:34:00 +0000 (14:34 +0200)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Mon, 14 May 2012 13:05:28 +0000 (15:05 +0200)
Some numbers like nr_running and nr_uninterruptible are fundamentally
unsigned since its impossible to have a negative amount of tasks, yet
we still print them as signed to easily recognise the underflow
condition.

rq->nr_uninterruptible has 'special' accounting and can in fact very
easily become negative on a per-cpu basis.

It was noted that since the P() macro assumes things are long long and
the promotion of unsigned 'int/long' to long long on 32bit doesn't
sign extend we print silly large numbers instead of the easier to read
signed numbers.

Therefore extend the P() macro to not require the sign extention.

Reported-by: Diwakar Tundlam <dtundlam@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-gk5tm8t2n4ix2vkpns42uqqp@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
kernel/sched/debug.c

index 31e4f61a1629f0af944acd463a4f73c415cb101b..6f79596e0ea91acc791ca3512a351f07605e3fbf 100644 (file)
@@ -260,8 +260,14 @@ static void print_cpu(struct seq_file *m, int cpu)
        SEQ_printf(m, "\ncpu#%d\n", cpu);
 #endif
 
-#define P(x) \
-       SEQ_printf(m, "  .%-30s: %Ld\n", #x, (long long)(rq->x))
+#define P(x)                                                           \
+do {                                                                   \
+       if (sizeof(rq->x) == 4)                                         \
+               SEQ_printf(m, "  .%-30s: %ld\n", #x, (long)(rq->x));    \
+       else                                                            \
+               SEQ_printf(m, "  .%-30s: %Ld\n", #x, (long long)(rq->x));\
+} while (0)
+
 #define PN(x) \
        SEQ_printf(m, "  .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", #x, SPLIT_NS(rq->x))