list: Expand list_first_entry_or_null()
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Sat, 23 Jul 2016 18:27:50 +0000 (19:27 +0100)
committerPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:57:43 +0000 (12:57 -0700)
Due to the use of READ_ONCE() in list_empty() the compiler cannot
optimise !list_empty() ? list_first_entry() : NULL very well. By
manually expanding list_first_entry_or_null() we can take advantage of
the READ_ONCE() to avoid the list element changing under the test while
the compiler can generate smaller code.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
include/linux/list.h

index 5183138aa932da88c83177b9f8372bd9c3437e13..5809e9a2de5b23939eef9dbf1653f7df299a7240 100644 (file)
@@ -381,8 +381,11 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init(struct list_head *list,
  *
  * Note that if the list is empty, it returns NULL.
  */
-#define list_first_entry_or_null(ptr, type, member) \
-       (!list_empty(ptr) ? list_first_entry(ptr, type, member) : NULL)
+#define list_first_entry_or_null(ptr, type, member) ({ \
+       struct list_head *head__ = (ptr); \
+       struct list_head *pos__ = READ_ONCE(head__->next); \
+       pos__ != head__ ? list_entry(pos__, type, member) : NULL; \
+})
 
 /**
  * list_next_entry - get the next element in list