iwl_mvm_send_lq_cmd(mvm, &lq_sta->lq, false);
}
+static bool rs_tweak_rate_tbl(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
+ struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
+ struct iwl_lq_sta *lq_sta,
+ struct iwl_scale_tbl_info *tbl,
+ enum rs_action scale_action)
+{
+ if (sta->bandwidth != IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_80)
+ return false;
+
+ if (!is_vht_siso(&tbl->rate))
+ return false;
+
+ if ((tbl->rate.bw == RATE_MCS_CHAN_WIDTH_80) &&
+ (tbl->rate.index == IWL_RATE_MCS_0_INDEX) &&
+ (scale_action == RS_ACTION_DOWNSCALE)) {
+ tbl->rate.bw = RATE_MCS_CHAN_WIDTH_20;
+ tbl->rate.index = IWL_RATE_MCS_4_INDEX;
+ IWL_DEBUG_RATE(mvm, "Switch 80Mhz SISO MCS0 -> 20Mhz MCS4\n");
+ goto tweaked;
+ }
+
+ /* Go back to 80Mhz MCS1 only if we've established that 20Mhz MCS5 is
+ * sustainable, i.e. we're past the test window. We can't go back
+ * if MCS5 is just tested as this will happen always after switching
+ * to 20Mhz MCS4 because the rate stats are cleared.
+ */
+ if ((tbl->rate.bw == RATE_MCS_CHAN_WIDTH_20) &&
+ (((tbl->rate.index == IWL_RATE_MCS_5_INDEX) &&
+ (scale_action == RS_ACTION_STAY)) ||
+ ((tbl->rate.index > IWL_RATE_MCS_5_INDEX) &&
+ (scale_action == RS_ACTION_UPSCALE)))) {
+ tbl->rate.bw = RATE_MCS_CHAN_WIDTH_80;
+ tbl->rate.index = IWL_RATE_MCS_1_INDEX;
+ IWL_DEBUG_RATE(mvm, "Switch 20Mhz SISO MCS5 -> 80Mhz MCS1\n");
+ goto tweaked;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+
+tweaked:
+ rs_set_expected_tpt_table(lq_sta, tbl);
+ rs_rate_scale_clear_tbl_windows(mvm, tbl);
+ return true;
+}
+
static enum rs_column rs_get_next_column(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
struct iwl_lq_sta *lq_sta,
struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
/* Replace uCode's rate table for the destination station. */
if (update_lq) {
tbl->rate.index = index;
+ if (IWL_MVM_RS_80_20_FAR_RANGE_TWEAK)
+ rs_tweak_rate_tbl(mvm, sta, lq_sta, tbl, scale_action);
rs_update_rate_tbl(mvm, sta, lq_sta, tbl);
}