When establishing a thin device's discard limits we cannot rely on the
underlying thin-pool device's discard capabilities (which are inherited
from the thin-pool's underlying data device) given that DM thin devices
must provide discard support even when the thin-pool's underlying data
device doesn't support discards.
Users were exposed to this thin device discard limits regression if
their thin-pool's underlying data device does _not_ support discards.
This regression caused all upper-layers that called the
blkdev_issue_discard() interface to not be able to issue discards to
thin devices (because discard_granularity was 0). This regression
wasn't caught earlier because the device-mapper-test-suite's extensive
'thin-provisioning' discard tests are only ever performed against
thin-pool's with data devices that support discards.
Fix is to have thin_io_hints() test the pool's 'discard_enabled' feature
rather than inferring whether or not a thin device's discard support
should be enabled by looking at the thin-pool's discard_granularity.
Fixes:
216076705 ("dm thin: disable discard support for thin devices if pool's is disabled")
Reported-by: Mike Gerber <mike@sprachgewalt.de>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.1+
{
struct thin_c *tc = ti->private;
struct pool *pool = tc->pool;
- struct queue_limits *pool_limits = dm_get_queue_limits(pool->pool_md);
- if (!pool_limits->discard_granularity)
- return; /* pool's discard support is disabled */
+ if (!pool->pf.discard_enabled)
+ return;
limits->discard_granularity = pool->sectors_per_block << SECTOR_SHIFT;
limits->max_discard_sectors = 2048 * 1024 * 16; /* 16G */