sizeof(share_id) is just the size of the pointer. On the other hand,
block->share_id is an array, so its size seems more appropriate.
A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression *x;
expression f;
type T;
@@
*f(...,(T)x,...)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
!share_id[2] && !share_id[3])
return NULL;
for (block = alloc->first; block; block = block->next)
- if (!memcmp(share_id, block->share_id, sizeof(share_id)))
+ if (!memcmp(share_id, block->share_id,
+ sizeof(block->share_id)))
return block;
return NULL;
}