region->end is defined as an upper bound of the requested address range,
exclusive --- i.e. as an address outside of the range in which the
requested CSR is to be placed.
Hence 0x0001,0000,0000,0000 is the biggest valid region->end, not
0x0000,ffff,ffff,fffc like the current check asserted.
For simplicity, the fix drops the region->end & 3 test because there is
no actual problem with these bits set in region->end. The allocated
address range will be quadlet aligned and of a size of multiple quadlets
due to the checks for region->start & 3 and handler->length & 3 alone.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
int ret = -EBUSY;
if (region->start & 0xffff000000000003ULL ||
- region->end & 0xffff000000000003ULL ||
region->start >= region->end ||
+ region->end > 0x0001000000000000ULL ||
handler->length & 3 ||
handler->length == 0)
return -EINVAL;