/* Should the FIFO driver handle this? */
sm = buf->start_method;
- if (sm == ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED)
- return -ENODEV;
+ if (sm == ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED) {
+ rc = -ENODEV;
+ goto out;
+ }
priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct crb_priv), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!priv)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!priv) {
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
/* The reason for the extra quirk is that the PTT in 4th Gen Core CPUs
* report only ACPI start but in practice seems to require both
FW_BUG "TPM2 ACPI table has wrong size %u for start method type %d\n",
buf->header.length,
ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_ARM_SMC);
- return -EINVAL;
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
}
crb_smc = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct tpm2_crb_smc, buf, sizeof(*buf));
priv->smc_func_id = crb_smc->smc_func_id;
rc = crb_map_io(device, priv, buf);
if (rc)
- return rc;
+ goto out;
chip = tpmm_chip_alloc(dev, &tpm_crb);
- if (IS_ERR(chip))
- return PTR_ERR(chip);
+ if (IS_ERR(chip)) {
+ rc = PTR_ERR(chip);
+ goto out;
+ }
dev_set_drvdata(&chip->dev, priv);
chip->acpi_dev_handle = device->handle;
chip->flags = TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
- return tpm_chip_register(chip);
+ rc = tpm_chip_register(chip);
+
+out:
+ acpi_put_table((struct acpi_table_header *)buf);
+ return rc;
}
static int crb_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *device)