sctp: do not update a_rwnd if we are not issuing a sack
authorMarcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:39:18 +0000 (18:39 -0300)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:31:11 +0000 (16:31 -0400)
The SACK can be lost pretty much elsewhere, but if its allocation fail,
we know we are not sending it, so it is better to revert a_rwnd to its
previous value as this may give it a chance to issue a window update
later.

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c

index 3c22c41a2bc2dc128d651f64b1a81036be22b9b3..7fe56d0acabf66cfd8fe29dfdb45f7620b470ac7 100644 (file)
@@ -215,10 +215,14 @@ static int sctp_gen_sack(struct sctp_association *asoc, int force,
                sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_RESTART,
                                SCTP_TO(SCTP_EVENT_TIMEOUT_SACK));
        } else {
+               __u32 old_a_rwnd = asoc->a_rwnd;
+
                asoc->a_rwnd = asoc->rwnd;
                sack = sctp_make_sack(asoc);
-               if (!sack)
+               if (!sack) {
+                       asoc->a_rwnd = old_a_rwnd;
                        goto nomem;
+               }
 
                asoc->peer.sack_needed = 0;
                asoc->peer.sack_cnt = 0;