Yong Zhang reported:
> [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
> kernel/sched/fair.c:5091 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
This is due to the sched_domain stuff being RCU protected and
commit
0b005cf5 ("sched, nohz: Implement sched group, domain
aware nohz idle load balancing") overlooking this fact.
The sd variable only lives inside the for_each_domain() block,
so we only need to wrap that.
Reported-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1323264728.32012.107.camel@twins
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
if (rq->nr_running >= 2)
goto need_kick;
+ rcu_read_lock();
for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
struct sched_group *sg = sd->groups;
struct sched_group_power *sgp = sg->sgp;
int nr_busy = atomic_read(&sgp->nr_busy_cpus);
if (sd->flags & SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES && nr_busy > 1)
- goto need_kick;
+ goto need_kick_unlock;
if (sd->flags & SD_ASYM_PACKING && nr_busy != sg->group_weight
&& (cpumask_first_and(nohz.idle_cpus_mask,
sched_domain_span(sd)) < cpu))
- goto need_kick;
+ goto need_kick_unlock;
if (!(sd->flags & (SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES | SD_ASYM_PACKING)))
break;
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
+
+need_kick_unlock:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
need_kick:
return 1;
}