In the current code "ent_per_page" could be more than "conn_num" making
"conn_num" negative after the subtraction. In the next iteration
through the loop then the negative is treated as a very high positive
meaning we don't put a limit on "ent_num". It could lead to memory
corruption.
Fixes:
dbb799c39717 ('qed: Initialize hardware for new protocols')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@qlogic.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
val = 0;
entries[j].next = cpu_to_be64(val);
- conn_num -= ent_per_page;
+ conn_num -= ent_num;
}
return 0;