selftests: kselftest_harness: Fix compile warning
authorMickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Sun, 11 Jun 2017 12:32:58 +0000 (14:32 +0200)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fri, 13 Apr 2018 17:48:29 +0000 (19:48 +0200)
commitdb14d7564396bd3325a7a3e9e74ad4574a094ca8
tree95491fbd39d58e70c4cea091449107b3fc4924a0
parent329812f9e6944ae14662e2cd51975ef76c3ac61c
selftests: kselftest_harness: Fix compile warning

[ Upstream commit 34a048cc06802556e5f96f325dc32cc2f6a11225 ]

Do not confuse the compiler with a semicolon preceding a block. Replace
the semicolon with an empty block to avoid a warning:

  gcc -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall -lpthread seccomp_bpf.c -o /.../linux/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf
  In file included from seccomp_bpf.c:40:0:
  seccomp_bpf.c: In function ‘change_syscall’:
  ../kselftest_harness.h:558:2: warning: this ‘for’ clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
    for (; _metadata->trigger;  _metadata->trigger = __bail(_assert))
    ^
  ../kselftest_harness.h:574:14: note: in expansion of macro ‘OPTIONAL_HANDLER’
   } while (0); OPTIONAL_HANDLER(_assert)
                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  ../kselftest_harness.h:440:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘__EXPECT’
    __EXPECT(expected, seen, ==, 0)
    ^~~~~~~~
  seccomp_bpf.c:1313:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘EXPECT_EQ’
    EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
    ^~~~~~~~~
  seccomp_bpf.c:1317:2: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the ‘for’
    {
    ^

Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c