xfs: ensure btree root split sets blkno correctly

xfs: ensure btree root split sets blkno correctly

For CRC enabled filesystems, the BMBT is rooted in an inode, so it
passes through a different code path on root splits than the
freespace and inode btrees. This is much less traversed by xfstests
than the other trees. When testing on a 1k block size filesystem,
I've been seeing ASSERT failures in generic/234 like:

XFS: Assertion failed: cur->bc_btnum != XFS_BTNUM_BMAP || cur->bc_private.b.allocated == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c, line: 317

which are generally preceded by a lblock check failure. I noticed
this in the bmbt stats:

$ pminfo -f xfs.btree.block_map

xfs.btree.block_map.lookup
    value 39135

xfs.btree.block_map.compare
    value 268432

xfs.btree.block_map.insrec
    value 15786

xfs.btree.block_map.delrec
    value 13884

xfs.btree.block_map.newroot
    value 2

xfs.btree.block_map.killroot
    value 0
.....

Very little coverage of root splits and merges. Indeed, on a 4k
filesystem, block_map.newroot and block_map.killroot are both zero.
i.e. the code is not exercised at all, and it's the only generic
btree infrastructure operation that is not exercised by a default run
of xfstests.

Turns out that on a 1k filesystem, generic/234 accounts for one of
those two root splits, and that is somewhat of a smoking gun. In
fact, it's the same problem we saw in the directory/attr code where
headers are memcpy()d from one block to another without updating the
self describing metadata.

Simple fix - when copying the header out of the root block, make
sure the block number is updated correctly.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>