apm-emulation: use wait_event_freezable() instead of freezer_[do_not_]count()
authorTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:06:53 +0000 (10:06 +0200)
committerJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:16:29 +0000 (09:16 +0200)
commit1d927c3b5a4005a2ebc5356e7e1eec436e15fa22
tree86a97fc15d4ea1d4fcd5bf5d92c31bb130ba6d75
parent51414d41084496aaefd06d7f19eb8206e8bfac2d
apm-emulation: use wait_event_freezable() instead of freezer_[do_not_]count()

vfork is moving away from freezer_[do_not_]count() one way or the
other leaving apm_ioctl() as the only user.  apm_ioctl() just wants to
wait for suspend/resume cycle to complete without hindering the
freezer.  Use wait_event_freezable() instead.

The only annoyance is that wait_event_freezable() wakes up with
-ERESTART if there are pending signals while apm_ioctl() wants to
ignore all signals until suspend is complete.  We can play with
@current->[real_]blocked but this is hardly a performance or latency
critical path - simply chill a bit on each iteration until
SUSPEND_DONE for unlikely cases where there are pending signals.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
drivers/char/apm-emulation.c