rcu: Do not call rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup() while holding rnp->lock
rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup() is called while holding rnp->lock. Currently,
this is okay because the wake_up_all() in rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup() will
not enable the IRQs. lockdep is happy.
By switching over using swait this is not true anymore. swake_up_all()
enables the IRQs while processing the waiters. __do_softirq() can now
run and will eventually call rcu_process_callbacks() which wants to
grap nrp->lock.
Let's move the rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup() call outside the lock before we
switch over to swait.
If we would hold the rnp->lock and use swait, lockdep reports
following:
=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
4.2.0-rc5-00025-g9a73ba0 #136 Not tainted
---------------------------------
inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
rcu_preempt/8 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
(rcu_node_1){+.?...}, at: [<
ffffffff811387c7>] rcu_gp_kthread+0xb97/0xeb0
{IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
[<
ffffffff81109b9f>] __lock_acquire+0xd5f/0x21e0
[<
ffffffff8110be0f>] lock_acquire+0xdf/0x2b0
[<
ffffffff81841cc9>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x59/0xa0
[<
ffffffff81136991>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x141/0x3c0
[<
ffffffff810b1a9d>] __do_softirq+0x14d/0x670
[<
ffffffff810b2214>] irq_exit+0x104/0x110
[<
ffffffff81844e96>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x46/0x60
[<
ffffffff81842e70>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x70/0x80
[<
ffffffff810dba66>] rq_attach_root+0xa6/0x100
[<
ffffffff810dbc2d>] cpu_attach_domain+0x16d/0x650
[<
ffffffff810e4b42>] build_sched_domains+0x942/0xb00
[<
ffffffff821777c2>] sched_init_smp+0x509/0x5c1
[<
ffffffff821551e3>] kernel_init_freeable+0x172/0x28f
[<
ffffffff8182cdce>] kernel_init+0xe/0xe0
[<
ffffffff8184231f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
irq event stamp: 76
hardirqs last enabled at (75): [<
ffffffff81841330>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x60
hardirqs last disabled at (76): [<
ffffffff8184116f>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x1f/0x90
softirqs last enabled at (0): [<
ffffffff810a8df2>] copy_process.part.26+0x602/0x1cf0
softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null)
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(rcu_node_1);
<Interrupt>
lock(rcu_node_1);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by rcu_preempt/8:
#0: (rcu_node_1){+.?...}, at: [<
ffffffff811387c7>] rcu_gp_kthread+0xb97/0xeb0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 8 Comm: rcu_preempt Not tainted
4.2.0-rc5-00025-g9a73ba0 #136
Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820/066N7P, BIOS 2.0.20 01/16/2014
0000000000000000 000000006d7e67d8 ffff881fb081fbd8 ffffffff818379e0
0000000000000000 ffff881fb0812a00 ffff881fb081fc38 ffffffff8110813b
0000000000000000 0000000000000001 ffff881f00000001 ffffffff8102fa4f
Call Trace:
[<
ffffffff818379e0>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[<
ffffffff8110813b>] print_usage_bug+0x1db/0x1e0
[<
ffffffff8102fa4f>] ? save_stack_trace+0x2f/0x50
[<
ffffffff811087ad>] mark_lock+0x66d/0x6e0
[<
ffffffff81107790>] ? check_usage_forwards+0x150/0x150
[<
ffffffff81108898>] mark_held_locks+0x78/0xa0
[<
ffffffff81841330>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x60
[<
ffffffff81108a28>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x168/0x220
[<
ffffffff81108aed>] trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[<
ffffffff81841330>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x60
[<
ffffffff810fd1c7>] swake_up_all+0xb7/0xe0
[<
ffffffff811386e1>] rcu_gp_kthread+0xab1/0xeb0
[<
ffffffff811089bf>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xff/0x220
[<
ffffffff81841341>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x41/0x60
[<
ffffffff81137c30>] ? rcu_barrier+0x20/0x20
[<
ffffffff810d2014>] kthread+0x104/0x120
[<
ffffffff81841330>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x60
[<
ffffffff810d1f10>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x260/0x260
[<
ffffffff8184231f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
[<
ffffffff810d1f10>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x260/0x260
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455871601-27484-5-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>