X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=kernel%2Fptrace.c;h=d34c05ac6f99b788308a4d529d4c4a4918706801;hb=672c40a112898c4a6467892e22d5979c14aa0820;hp=aed981a3f69c180dda76bfca76411656842eec01;hpb=d21572c5157174c8b13e892e19e09d70e06b4807;p=GitHub%2Fmt8127%2Fandroid_kernel_alcatel_ttab.git

diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
index aed981a3f69c..d34c05ac6f99 100644
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -150,11 +150,17 @@ static void ptrace_unfreeze_traced(struct task_struct *task)
 
 	WARN_ON(!task->ptrace || task->parent != current);
 
+	/*
+	 * PTRACE_LISTEN can allow ptrace_trap_notify to wake us up remotely.
+	 * Recheck state under the lock to close this race.
+	 */
 	spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
-	if (__fatal_signal_pending(task))
-		wake_up_state(task, __TASK_TRACED);
-	else
-		task->state = TASK_TRACED;
+	if (task->state == __TASK_TRACED) {
+		if (__fatal_signal_pending(task))
+			wake_up_state(task, __TASK_TRACED);
+		else
+			task->state = TASK_TRACED;
+	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
 }
 
@@ -225,6 +231,14 @@ static int ptrace_has_cap(struct user_namespace *ns, unsigned int mode)
 static int __ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode)
 {
 	const struct cred *cred = current_cred(), *tcred;
+	int dumpable = 0;
+	kuid_t caller_uid;
+	kgid_t caller_gid;
+
+	if (!(mode & PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS) == !(mode & PTRACE_MODE_REALCREDS)) {
+		WARN(1, "denying ptrace access check without PTRACE_MODE_*CREDS\n");
+		return -EPERM;
+	}
 
 	/* May we inspect the given task?
 	 * This check is used both for attaching with ptrace
@@ -234,18 +248,33 @@ static int __ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode)
 	 * because setting up the necessary parent/child relationship
 	 * or halting the specified task is impossible.
 	 */
-	int dumpable = 0;
+
 	/* Don't let security modules deny introspection */
-	if (task == current)
+	if (same_thread_group(task, current))
 		return 0;
 	rcu_read_lock();
+	if (mode & PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS) {
+		caller_uid = cred->fsuid;
+		caller_gid = cred->fsgid;
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * Using the euid would make more sense here, but something
+		 * in userland might rely on the old behavior, and this
+		 * shouldn't be a security problem since
+		 * PTRACE_MODE_REALCREDS implies that the caller explicitly
+		 * used a syscall that requests access to another process
+		 * (and not a filesystem syscall to procfs).
+		 */
+		caller_uid = cred->uid;
+		caller_gid = cred->gid;
+	}
 	tcred = __task_cred(task);
-	if (uid_eq(cred->uid, tcred->euid) &&
-	    uid_eq(cred->uid, tcred->suid) &&
-	    uid_eq(cred->uid, tcred->uid)  &&
-	    gid_eq(cred->gid, tcred->egid) &&
-	    gid_eq(cred->gid, tcred->sgid) &&
-	    gid_eq(cred->gid, tcred->gid))
+	if (uid_eq(caller_uid, tcred->euid) &&
+	    uid_eq(caller_uid, tcred->suid) &&
+	    uid_eq(caller_uid, tcred->uid)  &&
+	    gid_eq(caller_gid, tcred->egid) &&
+	    gid_eq(caller_gid, tcred->sgid) &&
+	    gid_eq(caller_gid, tcred->gid))
 		goto ok;
 	if (ptrace_has_cap(tcred->user_ns, mode))
 		goto ok;
@@ -257,7 +286,8 @@ ok:
 	if (task->mm)
 		dumpable = get_dumpable(task->mm);
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	if (!dumpable && !ptrace_has_cap(__task_cred(task)->user_ns, mode)) {
+	if (dumpable != SUID_DUMP_USER &&
+	    !ptrace_has_cap(__task_cred(task)->user_ns, mode)) {
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 		return -EPERM;
 	}
@@ -311,7 +341,7 @@ static int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *task, long request,
 		goto out;
 
 	task_lock(task);
-	retval = __ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH);
+	retval = __ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_REALCREDS);
 	task_unlock(task);
 	if (retval)
 		goto unlock_creds;
@@ -665,20 +695,22 @@ static int ptrace_peek_siginfo(struct task_struct *child,
 		if (unlikely(is_compat_task())) {
 			compat_siginfo_t __user *uinfo = compat_ptr(data);
 
-			ret = copy_siginfo_to_user32(uinfo, &info);
-			ret |= __put_user(info.si_code, &uinfo->si_code);
+			if (copy_siginfo_to_user32(uinfo, &info) ||
+			    __put_user(info.si_code, &uinfo->si_code)) {
+				ret = -EFAULT;
+				break;
+			}
+
 		} else
 #endif
 		{
 			siginfo_t __user *uinfo = (siginfo_t __user *) data;
 
-			ret = copy_siginfo_to_user(uinfo, &info);
-			ret |= __put_user(info.si_code, &uinfo->si_code);
-		}
-
-		if (ret) {
-			ret = -EFAULT;
-			break;
+			if (copy_siginfo_to_user(uinfo, &info) ||
+			    __put_user(info.si_code, &uinfo->si_code)) {
+				ret = -EFAULT;
+				break;
+			}
 		}
 
 		data += sizeof(siginfo_t);
@@ -717,6 +749,8 @@ static int ptrace_peek_siginfo(struct task_struct *child,
 static int ptrace_resume(struct task_struct *child, long request,
 			 unsigned long data)
 {
+	bool need_siglock;
+
 	if (!valid_signal(data))
 		return -EIO;
 
@@ -744,8 +778,26 @@ static int ptrace_resume(struct task_struct *child, long request,
 		user_disable_single_step(child);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Change ->exit_code and ->state under siglock to avoid the race
+	 * with wait_task_stopped() in between; a non-zero ->exit_code will
+	 * wrongly look like another report from tracee.
+	 *
+	 * Note that we need siglock even if ->exit_code == data and/or this
+	 * status was not reported yet, the new status must not be cleared by
+	 * wait_task_stopped() after resume.
+	 *
+	 * If data == 0 we do not care if wait_task_stopped() reports the old
+	 * status and clears the code too; this can't race with the tracee, it
+	 * takes siglock after resume.
+	 */
+	need_siglock = data && !thread_group_empty(current);
+	if (need_siglock)
+		spin_lock_irq(&child->sighand->siglock);
 	child->exit_code = data;
 	wake_up_state(child, __TASK_TRACED);
+	if (need_siglock)
+		spin_unlock_irq(&child->sighand->siglock);
 
 	return 0;
 }