Linux-2.6.12-rc2
[GitHub/mt8127/android_kernel_alcatel_ttab.git] / drivers / mtd / chips / fwh_lock.h
1 #ifndef FWH_LOCK_H
2 #define FWH_LOCK_H
3
4
5 enum fwh_lock_state {
6 FWH_UNLOCKED = 0,
7 FWH_DENY_WRITE = 1,
8 FWH_IMMUTABLE = 2,
9 FWH_DENY_READ = 4,
10 };
11
12 struct fwh_xxlock_thunk {
13 enum fwh_lock_state val;
14 flstate_t state;
15 };
16
17
18 #define FWH_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_LOCK ((struct fwh_xxlock_thunk){ FWH_DENY_WRITE, FL_LOCKING})
19 #define FWH_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_UNLOCK ((struct fwh_xxlock_thunk){ FWH_UNLOCKED, FL_UNLOCKING})
20
21 /*
22 * This locking/unlock is specific to firmware hub parts. Only one
23 * is known that supports the Intel command set. Firmware
24 * hub parts cannot be interleaved as they are on the LPC bus
25 * so this code has not been tested with interleaved chips,
26 * and will likely fail in that context.
27 */
28 static int fwh_xxlock_oneblock(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,
29 unsigned long adr, int len, void *thunk)
30 {
31 struct cfi_private *cfi = map->fldrv_priv;
32 struct fwh_xxlock_thunk *xxlt = (struct fwh_xxlock_thunk *)thunk;
33 int ret;
34
35 /* Refuse the operation if the we cannot look behind the chip */
36 if (chip->start < 0x400000) {
37 DEBUG( MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL3,
38 "MTD %s(): chip->start: %lx wanted >= 0x400000\n",
39 __func__, chip->start );
40 return -EIO;
41 }
42 /*
43 * lock block registers:
44 * - on 64k boundariesand
45 * - bit 1 set high
46 * - block lock registers are 4MiB lower - overflow subtract (danger)
47 *
48 * The address manipulation is first done on the logical address
49 * which is 0 at the start of the chip, and then the offset of
50 * the individual chip is addted to it. Any other order a weird
51 * map offset could cause problems.
52 */
53 adr = (adr & ~0xffffUL) | 0x2;
54 adr += chip->start - 0x400000;
55
56 /*
57 * This is easy because these are writes to registers and not writes
58 * to flash memory - that means that we don't have to check status
59 * and timeout.
60 */
61 cfi_spin_lock(chip->mutex);
62 ret = get_chip(map, chip, adr, FL_LOCKING);
63 if (ret) {
64 cfi_spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
65 return ret;
66 }
67
68 chip->state = xxlt->state;
69 map_write(map, CMD(xxlt->val), adr);
70
71 /* Done and happy. */
72 chip->state = FL_READY;
73 put_chip(map, chip, adr);
74 cfi_spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
75 return 0;
76 }
77
78
79 static int fwh_lock_varsize(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, size_t len)
80 {
81 int ret;
82
83 ret = cfi_varsize_frob(mtd, fwh_xxlock_oneblock, ofs, len,
84 (void *)&FWH_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_LOCK);
85
86 return ret;
87 }
88
89
90 static int fwh_unlock_varsize(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, size_t len)
91 {
92 int ret;
93
94 ret = cfi_varsize_frob(mtd, fwh_xxlock_oneblock, ofs, len,
95 (void *)&FWH_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_UNLOCK);
96
97 return ret;
98 }
99
100 static void fixup_use_fwh_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, void *param)
101 {
102 printk(KERN_NOTICE "using fwh lock/unlock method\n");
103 /* Setup for the chips with the fwh lock method */
104 mtd->lock = fwh_lock_varsize;
105 mtd->unlock = fwh_unlock_varsize;
106 }
107 #endif /* FWH_LOCK_H */